Skip to content

Security & Quality

Find the Problems Before Your Users — or Attackers — Do

Security testing and quality assurance for web and mobile applications, built into the development lifecycle, not bolted on at the end.

Security and quality issues are far cheaper to fix before launch than after. We provide both functional QA — making sure the application actually works as intended across devices and edge cases — and security testing focused on common, well-understood vulnerability classes in web and mobile applications.

This service applies to applications we've built and to existing applications built by other teams that need an independent review before or after launch.

Problems We Solve

  • Application hasn't been tested for common security vulnerabilities before launch
  • Bugs are being discovered by users in production instead of before release
  • No structured QA process exists before new features ship
  • Uncertain whether the application handles sensitive data securely
  • Need an independent security and quality review of an existing application

Our Approach

We test against recognized vulnerability categories such as the OWASP Top 10 for web applications, combined with functional testing against your application's actual expected behavior — not just a generic checklist.

Findings are documented with severity, reproduction steps, and remediation guidance, so your team can prioritize and fix issues efficiently rather than working from a vague report.

What's Included

Vulnerability testing aligned to OWASP Top 10 categories

Authentication and access-control testing

Input validation and injection testing

Functional QA across browsers, devices, and user flows

API security testing

Regression testing for new releases

Detailed findings reports with severity and remediation guidance

Re-testing after fixes are implemented

Technology We Use

OWASP ZAP Burp Suite Postman Selenium PHPUnit Laravel Dusk

Why It Matters

  • Vulnerabilities identified and fixed before they can be exploited
  • Fewer bugs reaching production and your users
  • A documented, prioritized path to remediation rather than a vague list of concerns
  • Increased confidence in the application's handling of sensitive data
  • An independent review that catches what an internal team might miss

Our Process

1

Scoping

Define what's in scope: application areas, environments, and depth of testing.

2

Testing

Execute functional QA and security testing against the scope.

3

Documentation

Record findings with severity and reproduction steps.

4

Reporting

Deliver a report with prioritized remediation guidance.

5

Re-Testing

Verify fixes once remediation is complete.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, we regularly perform independent security and QA reviews of applications built by other teams — this is often more valuable precisely because it's independent of the original development team.

We test against recognized categories such as the OWASP Top 10, including injection flaws, authentication weaknesses, access-control issues, and insecure data handling, tailored to your application's actual architecture.

Yes, findings are documented with severity ratings, reproduction steps, and remediation guidance in a report suitable for sharing with your technical and leadership teams.

Both are covered under this service — functional QA verifies the application works correctly, while security testing specifically probes for exploitable vulnerabilities. We scope the right mix based on your needs.

Yes, re-testing after remediation is included so you can confirm issues are actually resolved, not just addressed on paper.

Related Services

Ready to test before your users find the problems?